Progressive economists reject Unite leader’s criticism of Ed Miliband

<p>More than 40 progressive economists have written to Sharon Graham, the leader of Unite, rejecting her claim that <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/politics/edmiliband" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ed Miliband</a> would destroy jobs if he becomes the next chancellor.</p>
<p>With Andy Burnham almost certain to be prime minister within weeks, there is a fierce debate within Labour about who should succeed Rachel Reeves at the Treasury, with Miliband considered a frontrunner.</p>
<p>Graham advocates new licences for North Sea oil and gas extraction, as does the GMB union. She told the Sunday Times that Miliband’s fierce commitment to net zero would be a “<a href="https://observer.co.uk/news/politics/article/miliband-as-chancellor-would-be-noose-around-neck-of-job-creation-says-biggest-union" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">noose around the neck</a>” of job creation.</p>
<p>“Ed only seems to be interested in one side of the equation, rushing Britain to net zero with almost no thought for jobs, skills and national security,” she said.</p>
<p>As well as wanting to see more oil and gas extraction off Scotland, <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/unite" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Unite</a> has been frustrated by the closure of UK oil refineries and the lack of British jobs in the offshore wind industry.</p>
<p>In an open letter, academics including Kate Pickett, the author of The Spirit Level; Danny Dorling, a geographer; Daniela Gabor, a professor of economics at Soas University of London; and James Meadway from Verdant, a thinktank, urged her to withdraw the remarks.</p>










